• Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • COF Vision Statement
    • Leaders
    • By-Laws
    • State of Ohio Certificate
      • Articles of Incorporation
    • Upcoming Events
  • Repeal SB221
    • Why help repeal Ohio SB221 campaign?
    • Ohio’s Energy Nightmare!
    • What is Ohio Senate Bill 221?
    • Global Warming
      • Global Warming Myth or Reality?
      • Climategate emails
    • The True Cost of Wind Energy
    • Energy Sustainability
    • Energy Independence – A Congressional Primer
    • Oppose Kasich’s Severance Tax on the Natural Gas Industry
  • National Issues
    • Navy Bio-Fuels Program
    • Really?!
    • LEEDs and Agenda 21
  • What is Thorium Energy?
    • Thorium and LFTR Top Ten Attributes
    • A World Wide Energy Solution America Can Supply
    • Can Thorium End Our Energy Crisis?
    • The Thorium Dream
  • Resources
    • Political Resources
    • Presentations
    • Promotional Flyer
    • Podcasts
      • Kirk Sorensen
      • Dr. Robert Hargraves
      • Dr. Bill Thesling
      • Ken Kay

Int’l Business Times: Industry Group Releases Suggestions For Natural Gas Development In Marcellus Shale

facebook
twitter
27 Apr 2012
Jon

April 26, 2012 In the News, Newsroom

Int’l Business Times: Industry Group Releases Suggestions For Natural Gas Development In Marcellus Shale

By Pierre Bertrand

“This infrastructure is vital to obtain the economic and energy security benefits from this abundant natural resource,” read the Coalition’s report. “However it is also desirable to producers and the public at large to minimize impacts from these activities; therefore, our members have committed to apply recommended practices in site development and restoration.”

The Marcellus Shale Coalition, a trade group of oil and gas companies, released Thursday operational suggestions it hopes will standardize how the oil and natural gas industry approaches future drilling operations. The suggestions come as the industry seeks to tap the vast resources of the Marcellus Shale, which stretches from Ohio to New York state, using means that include the controversial practice known as fracking.

Meant more as a reference than a series of binding agreements, the coalition’s recommended practices touch on how companies could develop a lease and how they should go about restoring the landscape once a well is shut and decommissioned.

On the surface, the suggestions appear straightforward, and are the first in a series of releases expected in the next several months. The aim is to establish a list of best practices for the industry to help defuse tensions between property owners and the energy industry.

Among its numerous recommendations, the coalition says oil and natural gas companies should try reducing their impact on property and communities by drafting development plans with surface owners — those who will be most affected by the presence of a natural gas or oil derrick on their land.

The plans ideally would help harmonize the needs of the industry with those of the surface owners and local communities. The recommendations suggest for instance that companies build access roads that, when decommissioned, would remain useful to residents.

The coalition also suggests oil and natural gas companies do more to mitigate soil erosion, and provide suggestions for how companies could plant trees in former drilling sites.

Drilling for natural gas is not a simple process, and when hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is involved, a lot of equipment is required. Companies need access to road systems, will need to build gas transition lines, gas compressor stations, processing facilities and the drilling pad itself, the coalition said, all of which requires land.

“This infrastructure is vital to obtain the economic and energy security benefits from this abundant natural resource,” read the Coalition’s report. “However it is also desirable to producers and the public at large to minimize impacts from these activities; therefore, our members have committed to apply recommended practices in site development and restoration.”

The recommendations come after months of research, and community outreach, said the coalition.

The Marcellus Shale rock formation holds as much as 84 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and is the source of an energy boom in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Virginia.

“From site identification, to safety, communications, landowner engagement and eventual reclamation, this guidance document is the first of many that the coalition will release in the coming months – all of which are designed to increase awareness and share ideas and practices that work while continuing to raise the bar on responsible natural gas development across the region,” said coalition president Kathryn Klaber.

NOTE: Click HERE to view this story online.

About the Author

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. Coalition of Freedom April 27, 2012 at 5:08 pm Log in to Reply

    New post: Int’l Business Times: Industry Group Releases Suggestions For Natural Gas Development In Marcellus Shal http://t.co/mAmzsj7n

You must log in to post a comment.

Recent News

  • ‘Deep Ecology’ versus Energy (McKibben’s virus understood)
  • “Dirty, Dangerous, and Run Amok:” The Sierra Club’s War on Gas in their Own Words
  • Draft National Assessment on Climate Change: Politicization of the Scientific Method ("1,200 horror-studded pages … of pseudoscience")
  • “Peak Oil Is Dead”: M. A. Adelman Revisited
  • The Imperishable Permian Basin: Growing at 90 (Resourceship in action: I)
  • Wind Performing Badly
  • The ‘New’ Confusion About Planning: T. Boone Pickens and Energy Public Policy
  • Pickens Plan III: More Retreat but Still Errant (SPR oil for nat gas)
  • AWED Energy & Environmental Newsletter: May 13, 2013
  • The Perils of Energy Technocracy

Search the Site